Transforming Screening at Austria's Leading Clinical Research Coordination Center (CRCC)
40
per participant
min
reduction in screening time
77%
9
4 weeks
to first participants enrolled
after implementation
Full
screening adherence
The Execution Layer
for Complex Protocols
Others help sites follow the protocol.
DragOnFlow compiles the protocol
into the workflow
The Execution Layer
for Complex Protocols
Others help sites follow the protocol.
DragOnFlow compiles the protocol
into the workflow
The Execution Layer
for Complex Protocols
Others help sites follow the protocol.
DragOnFlow compiles the protocol
into the workflow
The Execution Layer
for Complex Protocols
Others help sites follow the protocol.
Overview
A leading Clinical Research Coordination Center (CRCC) in Austria, supporting four medical centers and clinics, partnered with DragOnFlow to address one of the most critical bottlenecks in clinical trials: patient screening, selection, and enrollment.
The Solution
CRCC implemented DragOnFlow’s protocol execution platform within their screening workflow. The platform transforms static protocols into interactive, step-by-step digital guides that:
-
Automate protocol adherence
-
Guide users in real time based on patient data
-
Eliminate the need for manual cross-referencing
-
Integrate seamlessly into existing workflows
The Results
Following implementation, CRCC conducted a direct comparison between traditional screening methods and DragOnFlow-enabled screening.
The impact was immediate and measurable:
-
77% reduction in screening time (from 40 minutes to 9 minutes)
-
Improved accuracy through automated protocol adherence
-
Real-time decision support based on patient-specific data
-
Streamlined workflows with no need for multiple document checks
The Challenge
Participant screening is a complex and time-intensive process, requiring careful evaluation of eligibility criteria. This challenge is amplified in rare diseases such as myelofibrosis, where protocols are highly detailed and require significant expertise and precision.
Traditionally, screening involved extensive manual cross-referencing across multiple documents, which led to inefficiencies, delays, and increased risk of errors. Each screening could take up to 40 minutes, limiting throughput and slowing down trial progress.
